EMPLOYMENT LAW

Action for Determination of Employment and SGK Disputes

Employment that went unregistered or was declared below the actual wage comes back on retirement day as missing days and a lower pension. This page explains the conditions of the action for determination of employment (hizmet tespiti) and the five-year forfeiture period, how the action is proven and, on the employer side, by which route Social Security Institution (SGK) premium debt and administrative fine disputes are resolved.

An insured person who worked but was not declared to the Social Security Institution (SGK) may prove the employment by a judgment, by bringing an action for determination of employment before the labour court within five years from the end of the year in which the employment took place (Article 86 of Law No. 5510). This is a forfeiture period; however, where an employment commencement declaration was filed or the employment was established by the Institution, the period does not run under the practice of the Court of Cassation (Yargıtay). The action is brought against the employer, the SGK joins the action as an accessory intervener, and the court investigates the evidence of its own motion as a matter of public order. Admission, waiver and settlement have no effect in this action; nor is mediation required as a condition of filing suit.

What we do in this area

The firm brings and conducts actions for determination of employment (hizmet tespiti) on behalf of employees to establish periods of employment that went unregistered or were declared with missing days or a lower wage; it pursues actions before the labour court against Social Security Institution (SGK) decisions concerning the rejection of retirement applications, cancellation of insured status and the calculation of old-age pensions. On the employer side, it conducts objection and litigation processes against SGK inspection reports, premium debt assessments and administrative fines. The majority of files are heard before the labour courts in İzmir.

This page is a sub-topic of the employment law tree. For severance and wage claims relating to the period established, see severance pay, notice pay and overtime claims; for accidents suffered while working unregistered, see the occupational accident and occupational disease page. The administrative court stage of administrative fines is handled under administrative law.

Common file types

File Claim Competent court
Employment never declared Determination of the start of insured status and the period of employment Labour court
Declaration with missing days Determination that the employee worked full time within the month Labour court
Declaration below the actual wage Determination of the earnings subject to premium on the basis of the actual wage Labour court
Cancellation of insured status Validity of periods cancelled by the Institution on the ground that there was no actual employment Labour court
Rejection of a retirement application Determination that the conditions for a pension are met and grant of the pension Labour court
SGK administrative fine Annulment of the fine Objection to the Institution, then the administrative court (Article 102 of Law No. 5510)
Premium debt and payment order Determination that no debt exists or annulment of the payment order Labour court (Article 88 of Law No. 5510)

How the action for determination of employment works

The action is brought against the employer of the workplace where the employment took place; if the employer has died, the heirs are named as defendants, and if the company has been deregistered after liquidation, restoration of its legal personality and proper representation may first be necessary. The liquidator does not automatically replace the company as defendant. The Institution joins the action as an accessory intervener and may take the judgment to appeal. The action concerns public order: the judge is not bound by the evidence brought by the parties and requests of the court's own motion the workplace file, the payroll records for the period, a law enforcement inquiry and the records of neighbouring workplaces.

Witnesses are at the centre of proof, but not every witness carries the same weight. In the practice of the Court of Cassation (Yargıtay), the statements of witnesses shown by payroll to have worked at the same workplace in the same period, and of witnesses who are the owners or employees of neighbouring workplaces, are relied upon; a file built only on relatives or witnesses from outside the workplace remains weak. Payslips, work correspondence, bank account movements, workplace health records and photographs support the witness testimony. When the judgment becomes final, the premiums for the period established are collected from the employer together with late payment surcharges; no premium debt is imposed on the employee.

A claim for determination of employment and employment claims are not combined in the same petition. The claims action is subject to mediation as a condition of filing suit, the determination action is not; files brought together are separated by the court and cause loss of time.

The employer side: SGK inspection, premium debt and administrative fines

Reports drawn up by SGK inspectors or auditors give rise both to retrospective premium assessments and to administrative fines for breaches of declaration and document obligations. The objection routes for the two claims differ. An objection to an administrative fine is made to the Institution within fifteen days of service; the objection suspends collection, and if it is rejected an action is brought before the administrative court within thirty days of service of the decision (Art. 102). Where the fine is paid in advance within the same period, three quarters of it is collected. For premium debt and the related payment order, the labour court is competent (Art. 88). Statements given and records submitted at the inspection stage set the framework of the subsequent objection; for this reason, the firm enters the file at the inspection stage.

Time limits and points to note

  • The action for determination of employment is brought within five years from the end of the year in which the employment took place (Art. 86); where an employment commencement declaration was filed or the employment was established by the Institution, this period does not run under the practice of the Court of Cassation.
  • The insured employment commencement declaration is filed before work begins, save for the exceptions in the law (Art. 8); a declaration made on the first day of work counts as a late declaration and gives rise to an administrative fine.
  • Waiver of the action, admission or settlement has no effect in an action for determination of employment; a private agreement with the employer does not establish insured status.
  • After the determination judgment, the retirement calculation is redone; in some files, completing the missing days changes the date of entitlement to a pension.

How a file is handled at the firm is explained on the how we work page.

FREQUENTLY ASKED

What people ask about this area

Can an action for determination of employment no longer be brought once the five-year period has passed?
The period is a forfeiture period and, as a rule, no action may be brought once five years have passed from the end of the year in which the employment took place (Article 86 of Law No. 5510). However, under the practice of the Court of Cassation (Yargıtay), the period does not run where an employment commencement declaration was filed, the employment was established by an Institution inspection, or part of the employment at the same workplace was declared. Each file is assessed separately on the basis of the Social Security Institution (SGK) service record and the workplace records.
If the workplace has closed or the employer has died, against whom is the action brought?
The defendant is the employer for the relevant period of employment. If the employer has died, the heirs are named subject to the applicable succession rules. If a company has been deregistered, restoration of its legal personality and proper representation may be required; the liquidator does not automatically become the defendant instead of the company. SGK participates as an accessory intervener, but that does not remove the need to establish proper parties.
What can be done if part of the wage is paid in cash and the SGK declaration is at the minimum wage?
An action may be brought before the labour court for determination of the earnings subject to premium on the basis of the actual wage; bank movements, job advertisements, wage information from professional chambers and witness testimony are used as proof. Failure to pay premiums on the actual wage is a just cause for termination on the employee's part (Article 24 of the Labour Code No. 4857) and gives rise to the right to severance pay. The determination judgment also affects the calculation of employment claims for the same period.
If an SGK administrative fine is paid, does the right to object remain?
It does. Advance payment within fifteen days of service secures a reduced collection, and this payment does not remove the right to object or to bring an action (Article 102 of Law No. 5510). The objection is made to the Institution and, if rejected, an action is brought before the administrative court within thirty days. An unsuccessful challenge does not by itself cause the discounted quarter to be collected.

If your question is not hereContact

IMPORTANT NOTICE

This page is general information only and does not constitute legal advice. Every file is assessed on its own documents, dates and parties; the general explanations here cannot be applied directly to your own situation. Prepared in line with the Union of Turkish Bar Associations’ advertising restrictions. This English text is a courtesy translation prepared by the firm; in case of any discrepancy the Turkish text prevails.

Write on WhatsApp